Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Personal Touch Med Spa LLC et al
| Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
| Personal Touch Med Spa LLC, Inder Hora, Sapna Hora, Alexandria Gardner, Dana Buffo and Tracie Carricker |
| 4:2010cv00683 |
| March 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting 93 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 1/17/2013.(hcic, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 10/18/2011. (hcic)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER - The 29 motion to dismiss filed by Personal Touch, Inder, and Sapna is DENIED. Pursuant to the concession Personal Touch, Inder, and Sapna made at the hearing, this Court GRANTS Auto Owners' 27 motion for summ ary judgment with respect to Gardner's claims and holds that the Auto Owners policy provides no coverage for the claims alleged by Gardner in the underlying state court complaint. The remainder of the 27 summary judgment motion is DENIED. Finally, the 31 motion to stay Auto Owners' motion for summary judgment is DENIED because it is now moot. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 1/14/2011.(prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
