Addy's Harbor Dodge LLC v. Global Vehicles USA Incorporated et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 3, 2015
ORDER: The court grants in part AHD's proposed Bill of Costs, ECF No. 154 , and grants AHD's Motion for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 155 . The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter costs in the amount of $1719.42; AHD is also awarded attorneys' fees of $95,457.50. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 2/3/2015.(mcot, )
|September 30, 2014
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Plaintiff is entitled to costs and attorneys' fees in an amount to be determined. No later than October 14, 2014, counsel for AHD shall submit an appropriately supported motion for attorneys' fees and application for costs in accordance with applicable case law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/30/2014. (mcot, )
|May 5, 2014
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Baez's renewed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 82 , is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Perez's renewed motion to dismiss, E CF No. 89 , is also GRANTED. Defendant Baez and Defendant Perez are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The parties should submit a proposed consent amended scheduling order consistent with this case being subject to trial during the Courts July 2014 term, with jury selection on July 31, 2014. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 5/5/2014. (mcot, )
|October 26, 2011
ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/26/2011. (hcic)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?