Wilson v. Byras et al
| Irvin Jefferson Wilson |
| B Lewis, Monica Wallace, William Byras and C Thompson |
| 4:2011cv02837 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Greenville |
| David C Norton |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation 70 by reference in this Order.Accordingly, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 40 is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 1/14/2013. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court finds the Magistrate Judges recommendation to be proper. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation 15 is incorporated herein by reference. It is therefore ORDERED that P laintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without service of process as to Defendant C. Thompson. It is further ordered that all claims against the remaining Defendants be DISMISSESD without prejudice and without service of process, except that process should be issued for Defendants Byras, Wallas and Lewis on the sole claim for denial of credits associated Plaintiffs auto breaking conviction. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 07/25/2012.(dsto)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
