Caves v. Holt et al
| Clayton B Caves |
| Mr Clark, Mr Bolton, Mr Koger, Ray E Holt, Michael Branch, D B Drew, Mr Johnson, Mr Crafton, Counselor Unknown Name, Mr Morris, Mr Lynchard, Admin Remedy Coordinator Unknown Name and Kenny Atkinson |
| 4:2012cv00070 |
| January 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Edgefield |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
JUDGMENT, by the Clerk. This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 62 and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunctions and/or Protective Order 2 . Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 08/06/2012. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 40 . Therefore, for the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, Defendants Holt, Branch, Drew, Johnson, Crafto n,Counselor Unknown Name at Coleman, Morris, Lynchard, and Admin Remedy Coordinator Unknown Name at Yazoo City are DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 06/03/2012. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
