Ice Box Company Inc, The v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 26, 2013
AMENDED AND RESTATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER which supersedes Original Confidentiality Order, ECF No. 71 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 2/26/2013. (mcot, )
|January 24, 2013
ORDER: By and with the consent of counsel for Plaintiff and for Defendants Pilot Travel Center, LLC and Hercules Poly, Inc., Defendant Pilot Travel Centers, LLC's Fee Petition filed December 28, 2012, ECF No. 117 , and D efendant Hercules Poly, Inc.'s Petition for Attorney Fees filed December 28, 2012, ECF No. 119 are each hereby withdrawn, with all issues regarding said Petitions being deem fully and completed resolved. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 1/24/2013. (mcot, )
|December 5, 2012
ORDER: Pilot's Motion to Compel, ECF No. 49 , Hercules' Motion to Compel, ECF No. 52 , and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, ECF No. 65 are each GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth in detail in the O rder. The Order also includes specific deadlines: no later than December 7, 2012, Hercules is to provide a reworded RFP 15 to Plaintiff, which Plaintiff must answer by December 19, 2012; no later than December 14, 2012, Plaintiff is to provide Bates- number designations of responsive documents to Pilot and Hercules; no later than December 19, 2012, all parties are to serve supplemental responses as ordered within; and no later than December 28, 2012, Pilot and Hercules are to submit requests for costs and attorneys' fees as set forth within the Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/5/2012.(mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?