Nancy Morris v. Hope Clinic LLC, The, et al
Nancy Morris |
Temisan Etikerentse, Sue Brabham, H Wayne DeWitt, Andrew J Bland, Richard T Burkholder, James M Brophy, Leemon E Carter, Patricia D Collins, Charles A Desanto, Kendra B Habersham, Ashley A Harber, Priscilla Scheetz, Jerry Speissegger, Jr, PFC Daaf, John Doe, Clifford L McElvogue and Hope Clinic LLC, The |
4:2012cv01720 |
June 22, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Berkeley |
Cameron McGowan Currie |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nancy Morris (Staley, Harold) (dsto) Modified on 6/29/2012 to correct event code (dsto, ). |
Filing 5 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (dsto, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Nancy Morris.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew J Bland, Sue Brabham, James M Brophy, Richard T Burkholder, Leemon E Carter, Patricia D Collins, Daaf, H Wayne DeWitt, Charles A Desanto, John Doe, Temisan Etikerentse, Kendra B Habersham, Ashley A Harber, Hope Clinic LLC, The, Clifford L McElvogue, Priscilla Scheetz, Jerry Speissegger, Jr ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-4141694.), filed by Nancy Morris. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Intent, #2 Affidavit of Jacqueline Moore, RN, #3 Affidavit of Richard Serra, MD)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.