Brown v. Hebert et al
Tookie Brown |
Herring, Noel Hebert, Drego, Tomarchio, FNU Mungo and FNU Phillip |
4:2012cv02595 |
September 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Kershaw |
Terry L Wooten |
Thomas E Rogers |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 JUDGMENT by the Clerk and this case is dismissed without prejudice. (dsto, ) |
Filing 63 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 56 ). The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. In light of the above ruling, the Report, (Doc. # 53 ), the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. # 33 ), and the Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc.# 46 ), are terminated as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 02/27/2014.(dsto, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Compel. Defendants shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to provide full and complete answers to Plaintiffs Interrogatories Nos. 1, 4, 6, and 7 and Plai ntiffs Request for Production No. 16. The remainder of Plaintiffs motion to compel is denied for the reasons set forth. Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file a response to Defendants motion for summary judgment 33 or his case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/24/2013.(dsto, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.