Lewis v. Samuels et al
| Larry Jamie Lewis |
| Charles E Samuels, Eric Holder, Jr., John Owens, Victor Loranth, Dr Crawford, Irwin Fish, David Massa, William Rigney, Dwayne Wilson, Curtis Brown and Gerald Ervin |
| 4:2012cv02684 |
| September 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Williamsburg |
| G Ross Anderson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
AMENDED JUDGMENT, by the clerk. This case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
82
JUDGMENT, by the clerk. This case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report 77 and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 07/16/2015. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against Defendants Charles E. Samuels, Eric Holder, Jr., John Owens, Victor Loranth, Dr. Crawford, Irwin Fish, David Massa, and William Rigney. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 03/28/2013.(dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
