Ward v. Muniz et al
| Joe Ward |
| Roshell Smith, Cathy Brown, Nurse Harris, Leopoldo Muniz and Aiken County Sheriffs Office |
| 4:2012cv03303 |
| November 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Aiken |
| Sol Blatt |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court hereby adopts the R&R 73 and incorporates it herein; the Court overrules the Plaintiff's objections 78 ; and the Court grants the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 42 . Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 03/26/2014. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff is given until September 6, 2013, to file any further responses to Defendants motion for summary judgment 42 pursuant to the Roseboro Order 46 ofJune 11, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/27/2013.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/18/2013. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court hereby adopts the R&R 17 and, it is ORDERED that Defendant Aiken County Sheriff's Office is dismissed from the case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 03/11/2013. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
