Davis v. Richland County et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Davis
Defendant: Richland County, Leon Lott, Sara Giron, Adrian Thompson, Adam Cornwell and Richland County Sheriff Department
Case Number: 4:2012cv03429
Filed: December 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court adopts the R & R (Dkt. No. 112 ) in part. The Court declines to adopt the R&R as to Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against the individu al defendants. The Court adopts all other portions of the R&R.Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 76 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiffs excessive force clai m against Defendant Giron with respect to her use of her firearm, DENIED as to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Cornwell, and GRANTED as to all other claims. Thus, Defendants Richland County, Lott and Thompson are DISMISSED fr om this action. Defendants' Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 114 ) is GRANTED. This matter is stayed pending resolution of Plaintiff's criminal charges in state court. The parties are ordered to apprise the Court of the status of those criminal charges every ninety (90) days and to notify the Court within thirty (30) days when those criminal charges are resolved. The stay will be lifted at that time. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 07/29/2014. (dsto, )
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court DECLINES to adopt the R&R 88 . The Clerk is directed to docket Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Summary Judgment and attachments (Dkt. No. 92-1 at 6-34) as a Response in Opposition to Dkt. No. 76 and this matter is RECOMMITTED to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 03/17/2014. (dsto, )
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R 59 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Richland County Sheriff Department are DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/18/2013. (dsto, )
October 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 52 Motion to Compel. As a result of the filing of an Amended Complaint, the Report and Recommendation (Document # 19 ) entered by the undersigned is hereby vacated and a new Report and Recommendation is entered herewith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/24/2013.(dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Richland County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richland County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leon Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sara Giron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adrian Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Cornwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richland County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?