Cox v. Davis et al
Chavis Laranzo Cox |
Bruce Oberman, Anthony J Padula and Anthony Davis |
4:2013cv00125 |
January 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Lee |
Mary G Lewis |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 68 ) by reference into this order. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 51 ) is GRANTED, and this case dismissed. All other pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 04/03/2014. (dsto, ) |
Filing 66 ORDER finding as moot 47 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/28/2014.(dsto, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Stay. For good cause shown, it is therefore ordered that this matter is stayed until September 4, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/11/2013.(dsto, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 12 and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Oberman and Padula are dismissed from this case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 05/16/2013. (dsto, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.