Zemp et al v. Sovereign Bank
| Madge Zemp and Sidney Zemp |
| Sovereign Bank NA |
| 4:2013cv01209 |
| May 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Darlington |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: Because Plaintiffs' complaint is sufficient to withstand the motion to dismiss, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice to the right of either party to file a motion for summary judgment after the completion of discovery. (ECF No. 8 .) Because Plaintiffs state their consent to a dismissal of their South Carolina Consumer Protection Code claim without prejudice, Count 1 of Plaintiffs' complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's Motion for Stay of Deadlines and Entry of Scheduling Order(s) is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 14 .) Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 7/9/2013.(prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
