Sheppard v. Myrtle Beach Police Jail et al
| Anthony W Sheppard |
| Judge Abigail, Magistrate Phipps, J Rubin Long Detention Center, Horry County Police Dept, Horry County Solicitors Office, Holding Jail, Public Defenders Office, General Sessions Court, Richland County Clerk of Court, Richland County Soliciters Offs, Richland County Sheriff Dept, Myrtle Beach Police Jail, Shannon Campbell, Teressa Odom, Tonya Tyler, Christy L Miller, Gainey Sheppard and James Rogers |
| 4:2013cv01380 |
| May 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Richland |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
JUDGMENT, by the Clerk. This case is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report 10 is adopted by reference in this Order. This matter is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 06/19/2013. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 5/31/2013. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
