Boschele et al v. Rainwater et al
| Anthony Boschele and Nancy Boschele |
| David G Rainwater, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office, Sam Parker, Chesterfield County, Kip Kiser and Robert Lee |
| 4:2013cv01419 |
| May 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Chesterfield |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 72 ) and incorporates it herein by specific reference to the extent consistent. The Court further grants Defendants' Moti on to Strike (ECF No. 82 ) Plaintiff's letter filed on November 19, 2015. However, the Court does not find the filing of this letter to serve as a basis to dismiss this action. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Husband's § 1983 claims for Fourth Amendment seizure and arrest violations and First Amendment violation, and his state law claims for false arrest and false imprisonment are therefore dismissed. However, all remaining causes of action may proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/10/2016. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
