Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Martin James Sharpe |
| Ubah, Unknown Dentist, William Akerman, South Carolina Department of Corrections, McClary and Gregg |
| 4:2013cv01538 |
| June 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Richland |
| G Ross Anderson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part Report and Recommendations re 151 Report and Recommendation; granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 144 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 163 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 9/25/2014.(elim, )
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/29/2014.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion to Compel as set forth in Order; granting 104 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff shall have until June 20, 2014, to file any supplemental responses to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 70 and 92 ; and denying 110 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/16/2014.(dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
