Newkirk v. Enzor et al
| Jerome C Newkirk, Sr |
| James B Enzor and South Carolina Department of Public Safety |
| 4:2013cv01634 |
| June 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Florence |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS the R&R except as to pages 23-33 ("SCDPS's Motion for Summary Judgment"), DENIES in part and GRANTS in part the Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Enzor (Dkt. No. 64 ), and DENIES in part and GRANTS in part the Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant SCDPS. (Dkt. No. 65 ). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/19/2015. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
47
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/24/2014.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re 25 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. No later than March 26, 2014, Plaintiff's current counsel is to provided such a notice to the client, providing the court with a copy of that letter by filing it in the co urt's electronic filing system ("ECF"). If Plaintiff has obtained new counsel, that counsel is to enter a notice of appearance in this court no later than March 31, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/24/2014. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
