Chabot v. Kennedy et al
| Timothy Chabot |
| Joseph P Kennedy, Shannon L Nee Kennedy Oliver and Kennedy Law Firm |
| 4:2014cv04611 |
| December 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Horry |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court finds no clear error, and therefore adopts and incorporates by reference the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 47 ] of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that D efendants' motions to dismiss [ECF Nos. 16 & 41 ] are GRANTED and, to the extent Plaintiff's response [ECF No. 25 ] could be construed as a motion to transfer venue to Maryland or North Carolina, that motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 8/10/2015. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: No later than April 10, 2015, Defendant Kennedy Law Firm must have retained counsel licensed to practice in this District and that counsel is to have filed a formal appearance in this case. If Defendant Kennedy Law Firm fails to retain licensed counsel who files an entry of appearance within this deadline, then it will be recommended that the pending Motion to Dismiss 16 be stricken as to it and default be entered against it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/24/2015. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
