Jeffcoat v. Anderson City Jail et al
| Lisco D Jeffcoat |
| Anderson City Jail and Anderson City Jail Medical Staff |
| 4:2015cv03056 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Anderson |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court therefore ADOPTS the R & R 59 as an order of the Court and GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 41 , 46 ). Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 01/27/2017. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint and ACCEPTS the R & R's recommendation 9 . Accordingly, the complaint against Anderson City Jail and Anderson City Jail Medical Staff is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process, and the case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 09/16/2015. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/24/2015. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
