Epps v. Midvale Indemnity Company

Epps v. Midvale Indemnity Company

Plaintiff:	Sherye Epps
Defendant:	Midvale Indemnity Company
Case Number:	4:2016cv02747
Filed:	August 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Florence Office
County:	Florence
Presiding Judge:	Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 21, 2017	Filing 101 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 90 ) is adopted in full and incorporated herein; Defendant's motion to enforce settlement (ECF No. 37 ) is granted; Plaintiff's motion for U.S. Marshal Service (ECF No. 94 ) is denied; Defendant Midvale's objections (ECF No. 98 ) are overruled, Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 99 ) are overruled; and this matter is ended. Th e terms of the parties' mediated settlement agreement shall be enforced in full, and Plaintiff shall sign the proposed general release in order to receive her settlement check. The $30,000.00 settlement amount shall be reduced (1) by � 36;9.932.99 in attorney's fees and costs payable to Plaintiff's former attorneys, Evans Moore, LLC, and (2) by $3,977.00 in attorney's fees awarded to Defendant, leaving Plaintiff a final settlement amount of $16,090.01. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 12/21/2017. (prou, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 21, 2017

Filing 101 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 90 ) is adopted in full and incorporated herein; Defendant's motion to enforce settlement (ECF No. 37 ) is granted; Plaintiff's motion for U.S. Marshal Service (ECF No. 94 ) is denied; Defendant Midvale's objections (ECF No. 98 ) are overruled, Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 99 ) are overruled; and this matter is ended. Th e terms of the parties' mediated settlement agreement shall be enforced in full, and Plaintiff shall sign the proposed general release in order to receive her settlement check. The $30,000.00 settlement amount shall be reduced (1) by � 36;9.932.99 in attorney's fees and costs payable to Plaintiff's former attorneys, Evans Moore, LLC, and (2) by $3,977.00 in attorney's fees awarded to Defendant, leaving Plaintiff a final settlement amount of $16,090.01. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 12/21/2017. (prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Epps v. Midvale Indemnity Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherye Epps
Represented By:	Scott Christopher Evans
Represented By:	James Bernice Moore, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Midvale Indemnity Company
Represented By:	John Robert Murphy
Represented By:	Hannah Davis Stetson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?