Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Electrolux Home Products Inc
||Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
||Electrolux Home Products Inc
||November 18, 2016
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||R Bryan Harwell
|Nature of Suit:
||Tort Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 15, 2019
ORDER: For the above reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order [ECF No. 48 ] and ORDERS Defendant to comply with this Limited Protective Order when conducting the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Plaintiffs. The Court GRANTS Defendants' related motion for an extension of time to take the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Plaintiffs [ECF No. 55 ] and DIRECTS the parties to complete this deposition within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. In light of the above rulings (which will likely result in additional discovery), the Court DENIES Defendant's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 56 ] without prejudice to refiling upon the completion of Plain tiffs' Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Defendant must file/renew any such motion for summary judgment within fifteen days of the completion of Plaintiffs' Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. The Court TERMINATES the parties' recent motion seeking a co nsent amended scheduling order [ECF No. 64 ] and DIRECTS the parties to submit a revised proposed consent amended scheduling order accounting for the new deadlines no later than February 19, 2019. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 02/15/2019. (lsut, )
|May 19, 2017
ORDER: The Court denies in part and grants in part Defendant's Motion to Sever, to Dismiss, and to Transfer Divisions [ECF No. 6 ]. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 5/19/2017. (hcic, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?