Scott v. Ray et al
| Bernard Scott |
| Patricia Ray, Allison Days, Angela Sumpter and Cpl. Shannon |
| 4:2017cv03100 |
| November 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Darlington |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court finds no clear error and therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R (ECF No. 67 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34 ) and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 02/12/2019. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER: The Defendants are given twenty days from the date of this order to brief this issue including, but not limited to, the relevance of Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239 (4th Cir. 2017). Thereafter, Plaintiff shall have fifteen days to file a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/11/2018. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER finding as moot 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; finding as moot 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/26/2018.(dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
