Hanna et al v. Dillon Police Department et al
| Linda Hanna and Gary Hanna |
| Dillon Police Department and Brian Genwright |
| 4:2017cv03273 |
| December 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Dillon |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court overrules Defendants' objections, adopts the 47 Report, and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.To be specific, Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to: (1) Mrs. Hanna's section 1983 claim for unlawful arrest against Defendants, (2) all of her other section 1983 claims against the Dillon P.D., (3) her state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Genwright, and (3) Mr. Hanna's claim for l oss of consortium against Defendants. Defendants' 33 motion for summary judgment is DENIED, however, with respect to: (1) Mrs. Hanna's section 1983 claims for unlawful detention and excessive force against Genwright, as well as (2) her state law claims for assault and battery against him. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/27/2019. (prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
