Humana Insurance Company v. Bi-Lo LLC
| Humana Insurance Company |
| Bi-Lo LLC |
| 4:2018cv02151 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Florence |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 09/27/2018. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Response now due October 23, 2018. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 9/27/2018.(tmcb, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael Patrick Abate ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8017343) by Humana Insurance Company. Response to Motion due by 10/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Vanderbloemen, Thomas) Modified on 9/26/2018 to remove proposed order (lsut, ). |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Extending Deadline to 10/23/2018 by Humana Insurance Company. Response to Motion due by 10/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Vanderbloemen, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Bi-Lo LLC. Response to Motion due by 10/4/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Holt, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Humana Insurance Company. Bi-Lo LLC served on 8/13/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Return Receipt Card)(Vanderbloemen, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Humana Insurance Company.(Vanderbloemen, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bi-Lo LLC. Service due by 11/5/2018. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Humana Insurance Company. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bi-Lo LLC (filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-7926614), filed by Humana Insurance Company. (lsut, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Humana Insurance Company v. Bi-Lo LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Humana Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Edward Vanderbloemen |
| Represented By: | Michael Patrick Abate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bi-Lo LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Charles Holt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
