Long v. The State of South Carolina
| William Von Long |
| The State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution |
| 4:2018cv02223 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Horry |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #18 Deficiency Memo w/original #17 Objection to Report and Recommendation, placed in U.S. Mail to William Von Long, #238950, BRCI, 4460 BRR, Columbia, SC, 29201 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 18 Deficiency Memo Entry #17 . See attached Deficiency Memo. Docket Correction due 10/12/2018. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 17 OBJECTION to #14 Report and Recommendation by William Von Long. Reply to Objections due by 10/17/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #12 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer w/NEF, #14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, 13 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail to William Von Long, #238950, BRCI, 4460 BRR, Columbia, SC, 29201 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the 2254 petition be dismissed with prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return because the petition is clearly untimely under the one-year limitations provision of the AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/07/2018. (dsto, ) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re: #12 Serve No-Answer Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/07/2018.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/07/2018. (Attachments: #1 Amended 2254 Petition)(dsto, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by William Von Long. Response to Motion due by 9/13/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION against Warden Broad River Correctional Institution, filed by William Von Long. Service due by 11/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail to William Von Long, #238950, BRCI, 4460 BRR, Columbia, SC, 29201 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 9/4/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/14/2018. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William Von Long. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
