Crawford v. Chesterfield County Sheriff Department et al
Billy Ray Crawford, Jr |
Sam Parker, Chesterfield County Sheriff Department and Chris Page |
4:2018cv02494 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Terry L Wooten |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Letter from Billy Crawford notifying the court that he is being transferred and will not be at current address. He will inform the court of new facility once transfer is complete. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, ) |
Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #12 MOTION injunct civil Lawsuit for violation of civil & constitutional rights filed by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr, #16 Order - 1983 - No Service, placed in U.S. Mail to Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. (kric, ) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #12 MOTION injunct civil Lawsuit for violation of civil & constitutional rights filed by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. It is recommended that the District Court dismiss this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 32425 (1989). It is further recommended that Plaintiffs motion [Doc. 12] for preliminary injunction be denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 10/29/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 10/15/2018. (kric, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #13 is granted; plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel #11 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 10/15/2018. (kric, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/19/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION to injunct [sic] civil lawsuit for violation of civil & constitutional rights by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Note to Clerk, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Proper Form Order, AO240 application, financial certificate, summons form, USM-285 forms (3), Court's complaint form, placed in U.S. Mail to Billy Ray Crawford (gpre, ) |
Filing 9 PROPER FORM ORDER directing Plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Case to be brought into proper form by 10/3/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/12/2018. (gpre, ) |
Filing 6 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (gpre, ) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 1:18-cv-00135. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Florence Division of District of South Carolina. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that for the convenience of the parties and in the interest of justice, the Florence Division of the united States District Court for the District of South Carolina is the most appropriate forum for Plaintiff's complaint regarding incidents alleged to have occurred in Chesterfield County, South Carolina. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are transferred to the Florence Division of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/6/2018) (jak) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/11/2018.] |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/11/2018.] |
Filing 2 Motion for Lawsuit Against Sheriff Sam Parker, Detective Chris Page & Chesterfield County Sheriff Department filed by Billy Ray Crawford, Jr. (**Clerk's note: copy of Motion mailed to Plaintiff at address listed on correspondence.) (jak) .[Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/11/2018.] |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jak) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/11/2018.] |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2, 3. Fri Aug 31 14:27:46 CDT 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/11/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.