Ladson v. Taylor
Petitioner: Rodney L. Ladson
Respondent: Edwel T. Taylor and Edsel T. Taylor
Case Number: 4:2018cv02597
Filed: September 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Filing 14 OBJECTION to #12 Report and Recommendation by Rodney L. Ladson. Reply to Objections due by 11/27/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
October 29, 2018 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, #11 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail to Rodney L. Ladson, #262438, MCI, 1516 Old Gilliard Road, Ridgeville, SC, 29472 (dsto, )
October 29, 2018 Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the 2254 Petition be dismissed with prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return because the petition is clearly untimely under the one-year limitations provision of the AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/29/2018. (dsto, )
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition)(dsto, )
September 28, 2018 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX300078333 (dsto, )
September 27, 2018 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail to Rodney L. Ladson, #262438, MCI, 1516 Old Gilliard Road, Ridgeville, SC, 29472 (dsto, )
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 10/18/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/27/2018. (dsto, )
September 24, 2018 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (dsto, )
September 24, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rodney L. Ladson. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Court of Appeals Order, #3 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ladson v. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Edwel T. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Edsel T. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney L. Ladson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?