PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) v. Caviness
| PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) |
| Tony Caviness |
| 4:2018cv02632 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) (Byrd, Robert) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) (Byrd, Robert) |
| Filing 10 DEFAULT JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA), against Defendant, Tony Caviness, in the amount of $201,793.15. (mcot, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF No. #8 ). Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 11/7/2018. (mcot, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA). Response to Motion due by 11/13/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Byrd, Robert) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Tony Caviness. (prou, ) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT byPNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Default and as to Military Status)(Byrd, Robert) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA). (Byrd, Robert) (Attachment: #1 Affidavit of Service - Tony Caviness) Modified on 10/16/2018 to replace document with corrected signature as provided by filing user (lsut, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tony Caviness. Service due by 12/27/2018. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA). (lsut, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tony Caviness (filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8021536), filed by PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA). Service due by 12/27/2018. (lsut, ) (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A - Account Agreement) (lsut, ). Modified on 9/27/2018 to add exhibit (lsut, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) v. Caviness | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA) | |
| Represented By: | Robert C Byrd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tony Caviness | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
