Clark-Jones v. Dillon County Administration
Plaintiff: Anitra Clark-Jones
Defendant: Dillon County Administration, Lisa Grey, Rodney Berry, Wilson Clyburn, Dillon County and Robbie Coward
Case Number: 4:2018cv03075
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2018 Filing 24 Summons Issued as to Rodney Berry, Wilson Clyburn, Robbie Coward, Dillon County, Lisa Grey. Service due by 3/13/2019. (dsto, )
December 13, 2018 Filing 23 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #22 Order Service - Non-Inmate w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail to Anitra Clark-Jones, 1603 Hardy Street, Dillon, SC, 29536 (dsto, )
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER authorizing service of process of the Second Amended Complaint by clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/13/2018. (dsto, )
December 11, 2018 Filing 21 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dillon County, Lisa Grey, Wilson Clyburn, Rodney Berry, Robbie Coward, filed by Anitra Clark-Jones. Service due by 3/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
November 30, 2018 Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #16 Second Proper Form Order w/NEF, original Complaint, (2)Summons and (2)USM-285s, placed in U.S. Mail to Anitra Clark-Jones, 1603 Hardy Street, Dillon, SC, 29536 (dsto, )
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/21/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/30/2018. (dsto, )
November 26, 2018 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dillon County, Lisa Grey, filed by Anitra Clark-Jones. Service due by 2/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 Proper Form Order w/NEF, Court ED Complaint, blank Summons and blank USM-285, placed in U.S. Mail to Anitra Clark-Jones, 1603 Hardy Street, Dillon, SC, 29536 (dsto, )
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re: #8 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2018.(dsto, )
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/5/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2018. (dsto, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Anitra Clark-Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Anitra Clark-Jones. Response to Motion due by 11/27/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dillon County Administration, filed by Anitra Clark-Jones. Service due by 2/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark-Jones v. Dillon County Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon County Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Grey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson Clyburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robbie Coward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anitra Clark-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?