Ackbar v. Connor et al
| Supreme Raheem Ackbar and Ronald Gary |
| Richard H. Sewell, Patricia S Connor, James N. Ishida, Karen Stump, Thomas E Rogers, III and Richard M Gergel |
| 4:2018cv03181 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Letter from Supreme R. Ackbar. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Patricia S Connor, James N. Ishida, Richard H. Sewell, Karen Stump, Richard M Gergel, Thomas E Rogers, III, filed by Supreme Raheem Ackbar. Service due by 4/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Recuse Judge Rogers by Supreme Raheem Ackbar. Response to Motion due by 2/5/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Recuse Judge Gergel by Supreme Raheem Ackbar. Response to Motion due by 2/5/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) Modified on 1/22/2019 to edit text.(dsto) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #11 Second Proper Form Order w/NEF and Civil Rights Prisoner Complaint, placed in U.S. Mail to Supreme Raheem Ackbar, #275886, aka Ronald Gary, #275886, PCI, 430 Oaklawn Road, Pelzer, SC, 29669 (dsto, ) |
Filing 11
SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 1/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 01/02/2019. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Supreme Raheem Ackbar, PCI, 430 Oaklawn Road, Pelzer, SC, 29669. Document Returned: #5 Proper Form Order. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF and blank prisoner civil rights Complaint, 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail to Supreme R. Ackbar, #182864, PCI, 430 Oaklawn Road, Pelzer, SC, 29669 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re: #5 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/30/2018.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/21/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/30/2018. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Supreme Raheem Ackbar. Response to Motion due by 12/10/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patricia S Connor, James N. Ishida, Richard H. Sewell, filed by Supreme Raheem Ackbar. Service due by 2/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
