Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee v. Retirement Living Associates Inc
Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee |
Retirement Living Associates Inc |
4:2019cv00046 |
January 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
R Bryan Harwell |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee.(Aiken, Jefferson) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee.(Aiken, Jefferson) |
Filing 8 REPLY by Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim . (Aiken, Jefferson) |
Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/4/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/19/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 2/19/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/15/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/15/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/14/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/14/2019, Discovery due by 8/13/2019, Motions due by 8/28/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 11/12/2019, ADR Statement due by 9/28/2019, Mediation Due by 10/28/2019. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to date set for jury selection. Responses to motions in limine shall be filed within seven (7) days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after 01/06/2020. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 1/15/2019. (lsut, ) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee by Retirement Living Associates Inc.(McGee, Thomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Florence County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acknowledgement of Receipt of Filed Copy of Notice of Removal)(McGee, Thomas) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Retirement Living Associates Inc. (lsut, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Retirement Living Associates Inc. (lsut, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Florence County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-21-03116 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8193766), filed by Retirement Living Associates Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (lsut, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee v. Retirement Living Associates Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Retirement Living Associates Inc | |
Represented By: | Thomas William McGee, III |
Represented By: | Patrick D Quinn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Methodist Manor of the Pee Dee | |
Represented By: | Jefferson Boone Aiken, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.