Mumford v. USA Football Inc
| Zachary G Mumford |
| USA Football Inc |
| 4:2019cv00119 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr. Judge Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, ) |
Filing 13
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26 Report due by 3/19/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/15/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/12/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/13/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/13/2019, Discovery due by 11/11/2019, Motions due by 12/6/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 2/10/2020, ADR Statement due by 12/24/2019, Mediation Due by 1/24/2020. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to date set for jury selection. Responses to motions in limine shall be filed within seven (7) days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after 04/03/2020. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 03/13/2019. (lsut, )
|
| Filing 12 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by USA Football Inc.(Kull, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Zachary G Mumford. (Corbin, Daryl) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by USA Football Inc.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/28/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Kull, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Zachary G Mumford.(Corbin, Daryl) |
| Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/5/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/19/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 3/19/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/14/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 6/13/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 7/15/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/15/2019, Discovery due by 9/11/2019, Motions due by 9/26/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 12/10/2019, ADR Statement due by 10/25/2019, Mediation Due by 11/25/2019. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to date set for jury selection. Responses to motions in limine shall be filed within seven (7) days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after 02/03/2020. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 02/13/2019. (lsut, ) Modified on 2/14/2019 to edit text (lsut, ). |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by USA Football Inc.(Kull, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Zachary G Mumford. Response to Motion due by 2/25/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A September 26, 2018, email from Grantland to Corbin, #2 Exhibit B December 7, 2018, email from Grantland to Corbin, #3 Exhibit C December 13, 2018, email from Grantland to Corbin, #4 Exhibit D December 17, 2018, email from Grantland to Corbin, #5 Exhibit E Florence County Clerk of Court Electronic Filing Log and Order ) No proposed order.(Corbin, Daryl) Modified on 2/12/2019 to add descriptions to exhibits as provided by filing user (lsut, ). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Florence County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Clerk of Florence County's Acknowledgement of Receipt of Notice of Removal)(Kull, Jeffrey) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/18/2019 to replace with corrected document provided by filing user) (lsut, ). |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by USA Football Inc. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Florence County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-21-002297 (filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8209264), filed by USA Football Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Documents) (lsut, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mumford v. USA Football Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zachary G Mumford | |
| Represented By: | Daryl James Corbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA Football Inc | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey C Kull |
| Represented By: | John M Grantland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
