Jackson v. State of South Carolina
| Michael D. Jackson |
| State of South Carolina and Warden Lee Correctional Institution |
| 4:2019cv00179 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Timothy M Cain. Judge Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, ) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF, AO240 and blank 2254 Habeas Petition, placed in U.S. Mail to Michael D. Jackson, #294410, LCI, 990 Wisacky Hwy, Bishopville, SC, 29010 (dsto, ) |
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 3/20/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/27/2019. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael D. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2019: #3 2254 Petition, #4 Envelope) (dsto, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
