Broughton v. State of South Carolina et al
Bryan J. Broughton |
State of South Carolina, Charleston County Jail and Sheriff J. Al Cannon, Jr. |
4:2019cv00220 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Thomas E Rogers |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #10 Order Dismissing Case w/NEF, #12 Judgment w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail to Bryan J. Broughton, #68028, SACDC, 3841 Leeds Ave., N. Charleston, SC, 29405 (dsto, ) |
Filing 12 JUDGMENT by the Clerk. This case is dismissed without prejudice. (dsto, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 03/11/2019. (dsto, ) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/AO240, placed in U.S. Mail to Bryan J. Broughton, #68028, SACDC, 3841 Leeds Ave., N. Charleston, SC, 29405 (dsto, ) |
Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 2/27/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/06/2019. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (dsto, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bryan J. Broughton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Letter, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.