Russaw v. Kellie
Edward Daniel Russaw |
Acting Warden Kellie |
4:2019cv02127 |
July 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Thomas E Rogers |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 13 TEXT Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Edward Daniel Russaw, #30048-001, FCIW, PO Box 340, Salters,SC, 29590 (dsto, ) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. No further extensions are anticipated. Return and Memorandum is now due November 18, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/16/2019.(dsto, ) |
Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden Kellie. Response to Motion due by 9/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Stoughton, Kathleen) |
Filing 11 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, served on US Attorney General on August 14, 2019. (dsto, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Michelle Stoughton on behalf of Warden Kellie (Stoughton, Kathleen) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to (by certified Mail-Return Receipt #7014-0150-0000-5030-7971) to US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room B-103, Washington, DC, 29530 (dsto, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Edward Daniel Russaw, #30048-001, FCIW, PO Box 340, Salters,SC, 29590 (dsto, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due 9/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/08/2019. (Attachments: #1 2241 Petition)(dsto) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400014205 (dsto, ) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 Letter from Edward D. Russaw re:filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Edward Daniel Russaw . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Russaw v. Kellie | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Acting Warden Kellie | |
Represented By: | Kathleen Michelle Stoughton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Edward Daniel Russaw | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.