Russaw v. Kellie
Petitioner: Edward Daniel Russaw
Respondent: Acting Warden Kellie
Case Number: 4:2019cv02127
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 13 TEXT Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Edward Daniel Russaw, #30048-001, FCIW, PO Box 340, Salters,SC, 29590 (dsto, )
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. No further extensions are anticipated. Return and Memorandum is now due November 18, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/16/2019.(dsto, )
September 9, 2019 Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden Kellie. Response to Motion due by 9/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Stoughton, Kathleen)
August 21, 2019 Filing 11 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, served on US Attorney General on August 14, 2019. (dsto, )
August 12, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Michelle Stoughton on behalf of Warden Kellie (Stoughton, Kathleen)
August 8, 2019 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to (by certified Mail-Return Receipt #7014-0150-0000-5030-7971) to US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room B-103, Washington, DC, 29530 (dsto, )
August 8, 2019 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Edward Daniel Russaw, #30048-001, FCIW, PO Box 340, Salters,SC, 29590 (dsto, )
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due 9/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/08/2019. (Attachments: #1 2241 Petition)(dsto)
August 8, 2019 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400014205 (dsto, )
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, )
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 Letter from Edward D. Russaw re:filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Edward Daniel Russaw . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Russaw v. Kellie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Acting Warden Kellie
Represented By: Kathleen Michelle Stoughton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edward Daniel Russaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?