Oakley, Inc. v. 90 Express, Inc. et al
| Oakley, Inc. |
| 90 Express, Inc., Viral Patel, Haemali Company, LLC and Satish D. Vadgama |
| 4:2019cv02150 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/5/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/6/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/6/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/6/2020, Discovery due by 3/4/2020, Motion in Limine due by 6/15/2020, Motions due by 3/19/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/2/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 7/6/2020, Mediation Due by 5/18/2020. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/27/2019. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 19 Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Oakley, Inc. (Josey, Jon) Modified to edit text on 9/27/2019 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 18 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Haemali Company, LLC, Viral Patel, Satish D. Vadgama.(Stover, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to 90 Express, Inc. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT As To Defendant 90 Express byOakley, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Counsel Affidavit of Default, #2 Exhibit B -- Affidavit of Service)(Josey, Jon) (Main Document 16 replaced on 9/17/2019) (cbru, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/17/2019) (cbru, ). |
| Filing 15 MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/6/2019. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 10/10/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/5/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 12/5/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/6/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/6/2020, Discovery due by 3/4/2020, Motion in Limine due by 6/15/2020, Motions due by 3/19/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/2/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 7/6/2020, Mediation Due by 5/18/2020. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/6/2019. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendants Haemali Company, LLC, Viral Patel, and Satish D. Vadgama are reminded that Local Rule 26.01 includes Interrogatories F and G which are directed to defendants only. Please file amended answers to the interrogatories including Interrogatories F and G no later than September 20, 2019. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Haemali Company, LLC, Viral Patel, Satish D. Vadgama. (Attachments: #1 LR 26.01 Answers 26.01 Responses)(Stover, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oakley, Inc. 90 Express, Inc. served on 8/2/2019, answer due 8/23/2019. Haemali Company, LLC served on 8/2/2019, answer due 8/23/2019. Viral Patel served on 8/2/2019, answer due 8/23/2019. Satish D. Vadgama served on 8/2/2019, answer due 8/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit for 90 Express, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit for Haemali, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit for Patel, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit for Vadgama)(Josey, Jon) Modified to edit text on 8/14/2019 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 8 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Satish D. Vadgama. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Viral Patel. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Haemali Company, LLC. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 90 Express, Inc. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Oakley, Inc.(cbru, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/1/2019) (cbru, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 90 Express, Inc., Haemali Company, LLC, Viral Patel, Satish D. Vadgama (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8590334) filed by Oakley, Inc. Service due by 10/30/2019(cbru, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/1/2019) (cbru, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
