Torrence v. Stephon
| Eli James Torrence |
| Warden M. Stephon |
| 4:2019cv02404 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Response to #11 Proper Form Order, by Eli James Torrence. Response to Motion due by 11/7/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #11 Second Proper Form Order w/NEF, 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Eli James Torrence, #356338, BRCI, 4460 Broad River Road, Columbia, SC, 29210 (dsto, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER finding as moot #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response per #11 Second Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/02/2019.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 11
SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 10/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/2/2019. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400014271 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #5 Proper Form Order, by Eli James Torrence. Response to Motion due by 10/3/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Eli James Torrence, #356338, BRCI, 4460 Broad River Road, Columbia, SC, 29210 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 9/20/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/30/2019. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eli James Torrence. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torrence v. Stephon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eli James Torrence | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden M. Stephon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
