Mederos v. Warden FCI Edgefield
Petitioner: Trinidad Mederos
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Case Number: 4:2019cv02770
Filed: September 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Filing 18 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #15 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, served on Attorney General of the US on 11/19/2019. (prou, )
November 14, 2019 Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #15 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to (by certified Mail-Return Receipt #7014-0150-0000-5030-8473) to US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room B-103, Washington, DC, 29530 (dsto, )
November 14, 2019 Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #15 Order 2241 Federal Habeas w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Trinidad Mederos, #53531-280, FCIE, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC, 29824 (dsto, )
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due January 1, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 2241 Petition)(dsto, )
November 12, 2019 Filing 12 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400014367 (dsto, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #10 Second Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Trinidad Mederos, #53531-280, FCIE, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC, 29824 (dsto, )
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 11/22/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/01/2019. (dsto, )
October 3, 2019 Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #6 Proper Form Orderw/ NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Trinidad Mederos, #53531-280, FCIE, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC, 29824 (dsto, )
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 10/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/02/2019. (dsto, )
September 30, 2019 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (dsto, )
September 30, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Trinidad Mederos. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mederos v. Warden FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Trinidad Mederos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?