Williams v. Tucker
Plaintiff: James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr
Defendant: Deputy Solicitor Todd Tucker
Case Number: 4:2019cv03421
Filed: December 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Referring Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Filing 18 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #16 Order - 1983 - No Service w/NEF, #17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr., #25060, Florence County Detention Center, 6719 Friendfield Road, Effingham, SC 29541. (prou, )
January 21, 2020 Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this action with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/4/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 1/21/2020. (prou, )
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 1/21/2020. (prou, )
December 17, 2019 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 10 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #11 Proper Form Order and Notice w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr., #25060, Florence County Detention Center, 6719 Friendfield Road, Effingham, SC 29541. (prou, )
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PROPER FORM ORDER AND NOTICE: Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his Complaint by filing an amended complaint by December 31, 2019, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the undersigned will conduct screening of the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims be dismissed without leave for further amendment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/17/2019. (prou, )
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has submitted an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, which is construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the Motion reveals that Plaintiff does not have the funds to prepay the filing fee. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ECF No. #2 . By filing this case, Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the United States of America in the amount of $350. See 28 U.S.C. 1914. This debt is not dischargeable in the event Plaintiff seeks relief under the bankruptcy provisions of the United States Code. See 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(17). The Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") of 1996 permits a prisoner to file a civil action without prepayment of fees or security, but requires the prisoner "to pay the full amount of the filing fee" as funds are available. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (b). As the court has granted Plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis, the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prisoner trust account in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), until the full $350 filing fee is paid. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/17/2019.(prou, )
December 9, 2019 Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (prou, )
December 9, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr. Response to Motion due by 12/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(prou, )
December 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Todd Tucker, filed by James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr. Service due by 3/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Plaintiff, #2 Envelope 1, #3 Envelope 2)(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Solicitor Todd Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Edward Ahmad Williams, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?