Weiters v. Bragg
Petitioner: Bernard Weiters, Jr
Respondent: M. Travis Bragg
Case Number: 4:2020cv01575
Filed: April 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2020 Filing 16 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #12 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, served on US Attorney General on June 16, 2020. (dsto, )
June 11, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION to Stay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by M. Travis Bragg. Response to Motion due by 6/25/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Bianchi, Robert)
June 10, 2020 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #12 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to (by certified Mail-Return Receipt #7018-1830-0001-8538-6119) to US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, room B-103, Washington, DC, 20530 (dsto, )
June 10, 2020 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #12 Order 2241 Federal Habeas w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Bernard Weiters, Jr., #18672-171, BFCI, PO Box 52020, Bennettsville, SC, 29512 (dsto, )
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum is due July 30, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 2241 Petition)(dsto, )
June 8, 2020 Filing 10 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400014626 (dsto, )
May 6, 2020 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Bernard Weiters, Jr., #18672-171, BFCI, PO Box 52020, Bennettsville, SC, 29512 (dsto, )
May 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 5/27/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/06/2020. (dsto, )
April 24, 2020 Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 4 Case Reassigned placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Bernard Weiters, Jr #18672-171 Bennettsville FCI PO Box 52020 Bennettsville, SC 29512 (bshr, )
April 24, 2020 Filing 4 Case Reassigned to Honorable David C. Norton. Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. no longer assigned to the case. (bshr, )
April 22, 2020 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, )
April 22, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bernard Weiters, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weiters v. Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Travis Bragg
Represented By: Robert Nicholas Bianchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bernard Weiters, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?