Parris v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Daniel Parris
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record
Case Number: 4:2020cv02740
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2020 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Parris. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration served on 8/24/2020, pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.03 answer due 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Green Cards)(Cummings, William)
August 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number SCX400014704. (prou, )
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF #3 ) be denied. It is recommended upon adoption of this Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full filing fee within 14 days of the Order by the district judge. Objections to R&R due by 8/17/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/03/2020. (dsto, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (prou, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Daniel Parris. Response to Motion due by 8/10/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(prou, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Daniel Parris. Service due by 10/26/2020.(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parris v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Parris
Represented By: William Blake Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?