Geissler v. Sterling
Russell C. Geissler |
Bryan P. Sterling |
4:2020cv03440 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Thomas E Rogers |
Margaret B Seymour |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: In his status report filed November 13, 2020, counsel for Plaintiff indicated that the parties were attempting to resolve this case prior to incurring additional litigation costs, and Plaintiff would file an amended complaint within the next few weeks, if they were unable to do so. The parties are directed to file a Status Report with the court no later than December 8, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/17/2020. (dsto, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James Rufus Bratton, III on behalf of Bryan P. Sterling (Bratton, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel F Arthur, III on behalf of Bryan P. Sterling (Arthur, Samuel) |
Filing 9 STATUS REPORT re: TEXT ORDER #7. (McGreevy, John) Modified on 11/17/2020 to edit text. (dsto) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: On September 25, 2020, Judge Seymour entered an order (ECF No. #1 ) severing Plaintiff's individual claims from the class action claims, opening this case, and appointing new counsel to represent Plaintiff as to his individual claims for damages. The order also directed new counsel to "file an amended complaint in the severed action, as appropriate." Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to file a status report within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/05/2020. (dsto, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION Pro Se Motion for award of 1% of Settlement Amount or to set matter for jury trial by Russell Geissler. Response to Motion due by 11/12/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER to enter the attachment as a pending motion. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 10/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Motion)(dsto, ) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bryan P. Sterling, filed by Russell C. Geissler. Service due by 12/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 SCDC FY 2018-19 Proposed Budget)(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER to break-out. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 09/25/2020. (dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Geissler v. Sterling | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bryan P. Sterling | |
Represented By: | James Rufus Bratton, III |
Represented By: | Samuel F Arthur, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Russell C. Geissler | |
Represented By: | John Whitney McGreevy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.