Morman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Teresa Morman
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record
Case Number: 4:2020cv04365
Filed: December 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Teresa Morman: It is recommended upon adoption of this report and recommendation that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full filing fee of $402 within 14 days of the order by the district judge. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 1/12/2021. (gnan )
December 22, 2020 Filing 7 ANSWER to Interrogatories by Teresa Morman. (Attachments: #1 Answer to Special Interrogatories)(McChesney, Paul) (Modified on 12/23/2020 to replace main document with correct case number). (gnan )
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER on #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court Orders Plaintiff to answer the attached Special Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Special Interrogatories).(gnan ) (Modified on 12/21/2020 to replace attachment with correct document) (gnan)
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service due by 3/17/2021. (gnan )
December 17, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Teresa Morman. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2021. No proposed order. Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(gnan )
December 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Teresa Morman. Service due by 3/17/2021.(gnan )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Morman
Represented By: Paul Townsend McChesney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?