Bailey v. DePuy Orthopedics Inc et al
| Cheryl D Bailey |
| Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Depuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International and DePuy Inc |
| 4:2021cv00319 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case transferred to Ohio Northern District per certified copy of Conditional Transfer Order Number CTO 318. The Transferring Clerk's Office hereby attests the record and the docket sheet available through CM/ECF to be the certified list. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DePuy Inc, DePuy Orthopedics Inc, Depuy International Limited, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. Service due by 5/3/2021. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Cheryl D Bailey. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DePuy Inc, DePuy Orthopedics Inc, Depuy International Limited, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc (filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9624274), filed by Cheryl D Bailey. (hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
