Doe v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Justin Vazquez, Myrtle Beach, City of, Amy Prock and Myrtle Beach Police Department
Case Number: 4:2021cv00635
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Joseph Dawson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2021 Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Justin Vazquez.(Moss, Kenneth)
April 14, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Justin Vazquez.(Moss, Kenneth)
March 25, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Warner Battle on behalf of Myrtle Beach Police Department, Myrtle Beach, City of, Amy Prock (Battle, Michael)
March 11, 2021 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jane Doe.(Dejeu, Adrian)
March 11, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jane Doe of Defendant Justin Vazquez (Dejeu, Adrian)
March 9, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Amy Prock.(Battle, James)
March 9, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Myrtle Beach Police Department, Myrtle Beach, City of.(Battle, James)
March 4, 2021 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Myrtle Beach Police Department, Myrtle Beach, City of, Amy Prock.(swel, )
March 4, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Circuit Court, case number 2021-cp-26-00067. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 04209689139),filed by Amy Prock, Myrtle Beach, City of, Myrtle Beach Police Department. (Attachments: #1 State Court Notice of Removal, #2 State Court Summons and Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service)(swel, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Vazquez
Represented By: Kenneth Ray Moss, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Myrtle Beach, City of
Represented By: James Richard Battle, II
Represented By: Michael Warner Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Prock
Represented By: James Richard Battle, II
Represented By: Michael Warner Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Myrtle Beach Police Department
Represented By: James Richard Battle, II
Represented By: Michael Warner Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Adrian Gabriel Dejeu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?