Pipkin v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Plaintiff: Bryan Pipkin
Defendant: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv00642
Filed: March 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 38 U.S.C. ยง 4301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2021 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Duke Energy Progress, LLC. (Foster, William)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/11/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/4/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 5/25/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/6/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/29/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/30/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/17/2021, Discovery due by 10/18/2021, Motions due by 11/1/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 12/29/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 1/18/2022, Mediation Due by 11/15/2021. Motions in limine must be filed no later than December 16, 2021.Written responses are due 7 days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs 7 days prior to the date set for jury selection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/20/2021. (dsto, )
April 16, 2021 Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Bryan Pipkin.Reply to Response to Motion due by 4/23/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Porter, James) (Main Document 18 replaced on 4/19/2021 to correct case number) (dsto,)
April 8, 2021 Filing 17 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER Entry #11 Reason: filed in error by attorney. Corrected Filing Document Number #16 . (dsto, )
April 8, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Foster, III on behalf of Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Foster, William)
April 8, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Katie Elizabeth Towery on behalf of Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Towery, Katie)
April 8, 2021 Filing 14 Defendant's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Duke Energy Progress, LLC.(Towery, Katie) (Modified on 4/8/2021 to replace document with corrected document provided by filing user). (gnan ).
April 8, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Duke Energy Progress, LLC.(Towery, Katie) (Main Document 13 replaced on 4/8/2021) (gnan, ).
April 8, 2021 Filing 12 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss by Duke Energy Progress, LLC. Response to Motion due by 4/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Text Message, #3 Exhibit B - Text Message)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Towery, Katie) (Modified on 4/8/2021 to replace Main Document and Attachment 1 with corrected documents provided by filing user). (gnan) Modified on 4/8/2021 to edit text. (dsto)
March 25, 2021 Filing 10 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Bryan Pipkin. Duke Energy Progress, LLC served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance of Service)(Porter, James). Modified on 3/25/2021 to replace with corrected document provided by filing user (prou, ).
March 25, 2021 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Duke Energy Progress, LLC. Service due by 6/23/2021. (gnan )
March 24, 2021 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Duke Energy Progress, LLC, filed by Bryan Pipkin. Service due by 6/22/2021 (Porter, James) Modified on 3/25/2021 to remove the Amended Summons (prou, ).
March 23, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bryan Pipkin re #1 Complaint, #4 Summons Issued, #3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Porter, James)
March 11, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Salley Millender on behalf of Bryan Pipkin (Millender, Elizabeth)
March 8, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC. Service due by 6/7/2021. (dsto, )
March 5, 2021 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Bryan Pipkin.(dsto, )
March 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, filed by Bryan Pipkin. Service due by 6/3/2021.(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pipkin v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Pipkin
Represented By: James Paul Porter
Represented By: Elizabeth Salley Millender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Represented By: Katie Elizabeth Towery
Represented By: William H Foster, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?