Mason v. Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC et al
Patrese Mason |
Brock Oates and Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC |
4:2021cv01485 |
May 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Sherri A Lydon |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 First MOTION to Remand Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Response filed by Patrese Mason. (Banyas, Bradley) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION to Remand Response filed by Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC, Brock Oates.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/8/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Rachal v. Natchitoches)(Thompson, Joshua) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Bradley Hunter Banyas for June 28-July 12, 2021 (Banyas, Bradley) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's Response to Motion to Remand, ECF No. #7 , is due on July 2, 2021. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 6/15/2021. (lgib, ) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 First MOTION to Remand by Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC, Brock Oates. Response to Motion due by 6/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Thompson, Joshua) |
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response filed by Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC, Brock Oates. (Thompson, Joshua) |
Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand by Patrese Mason. Response to Motion due by 6/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit 1 (Estate of Maglioli v. Andover et al.))No proposed order.(Banyas, Bradley) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response filed by Patrese Mason.Reply to Response to Motion due by 6/15/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Banyas, Bradley) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Response to Motion due by 6/8/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC, Brock Oates. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A - Myrtle Beach Sun News Article, #3 Exhibit B - McLeod Loris Discharge Summary (Redacted per R 5.2))No proposed order.(Thompson, Joshua) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Patrese Mason.(Banyas, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC, Brock Oates. (lgib, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-26-01984 (filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9853906), filed by Brock Oates, Loris Rehab and Nursing Center LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Acceptance of Service on Loris & Oates, #3 Exhibit C - Myrtle Beach Sun News Article) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.