Hancock et al v. A P Moller-Maersk et al
| Aunt T and Tony Hancock |
| As Samanta, A P Moller-Maersk, Ahrenkiel Steamship GMBH & CO KG, Maersk Weymouth M, Harper Petersen Holding, As Samanta Schifffartsgesellchaft MBH & Co. KG, As Samanta Schiffarhrts, Conchart GMBH & Co KG, Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Steamship GMBH & Co. KG and M/V AS Samanta |
| 4:2021cv01486 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/26/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 12/27/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/27/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/27/2022, Discovery due by 3/29/2022, Motions due by 4/13/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 5/28/2022, ADR Statement due by 4/11/2022, Mediation Due by 5/11/2022. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to the date set for jury selection. Responses to motions in limine shall be filed within seven (7) days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after 7/7/2022. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 7/2/2021. (hcic, )
|
| Filing 12 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by A P Moller-Maersk.(Gilsenan, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Report by Tony Hancock.(Winslow, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Tony Hancock.(Winslow, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Dawn Argoe on behalf of Tony Hancock (Argoe, Allison) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by A P Moller-Maersk.(Gilsenan, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiffs' Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tony Hancock.(Winslow, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tony Hancock. Service due by 8/26/2021 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Supporting Documents) (Winslow, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/17/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 7/1/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 7/1/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 8/26/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 9/27/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 10/27/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 10/27/2021, Discovery due by 12/29/2021, Motions due by 1/13/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 2/28/2022, ADR Statement due by 1/12/2022, Mediation Due by 2/11/2022. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to the date set for jury selection. Responses to motions in limine shall be filed within seven (7) days after the motion is filed. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after 4/7/2022. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 5/28/2021. (hcic, )
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by A P Moller-Maersk.(Gilsenan, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by A P Moller-Maersk.(swel, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-26-02285. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9854480), filed by A P Moller-Maersk. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(swel, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
