Rankin v. City of Florence et al
William Dwayne Rankin |
Florence Sheriff, Magistrate Courts, City of Florence, S.L.E.D. Drug Task Force, Debra O. Jackson, Edward Sieban and Investigator Seegars |
4:2021cv01711 |
June 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #16 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, #17 Judgment w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to William Dwayne Rankin, #4764, FCDC, 6719 Friendfield Road, Effingham, SC, 29541 (dsto, ) |
Filing 17 JUDGMENT by the Clerk. This case is dismissed with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (dsto, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF #14 ) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without issuance and service of process.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 08/05/2021. (dsto, ) |
Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #13 No Server Order w/NEF, #14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to William Dwayne Rankin, #4764, FCDC, 6719 Friendfield Road, Effingham, SC, 29541 (dsto, ) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the District Court dismiss the Complaint in this case with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 7/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 07/07/2021. (dsto, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 07/07/2021. (dsto, ) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Debra O. Jackson, Edward Sieban, Investigator Seegars, filed by William Dwayne Rankin. Service due by 10/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #6 Proper Form Order w/NEF and prisoner civil rights complaint form, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to William Dwayne Rankin, #4764, FCDC, 6719 Friendfield Road, Effingham, SC, 29541 (dsto, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #6 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/15/2021.(dsto, ) |
Filing 6 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 7/6/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/15/2021. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by William Dwayne Rankin. Response to Motion due by 6/23/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Florence, Florence Sheriff, Magistrate Courts, S.L.E.D. Drug Task Force, filed by William Dwayne Rankin. Service due by 9/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.