Aguilar et al v. Ochoa et al
Beatriz Adriana Aguilar Gonzalez, Leonardo Sarmiento Ochoa and Miguel Angel De Leon Aguilar |
Myrtle Beach, City of, David A Eck, Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of, South Carolina Highway Patrol and South Carolina Department of Public Safety |
4:2021cv01765 |
June 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
R Bryan Harwell |
Kaymani D West |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of, Myrtle Beach, City of.(Battle, James) |
Filing 23 Plaintiffs' Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Miguel Angel De Leon Aguilar.(Hodge, James) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice as to SCHP and certain claims against SCDPS (Does not end case) by South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol. (Johnson, James) |
Filing 19 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/14/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/18/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/17/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/4/2022, Discovery due by 4/18/2022, Motions due by 5/3/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/16/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 7/18/2022, ADR Statement due by 5/2/2022, Mediation Due by 6/1/2022, Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to July 18, 2022.Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 07/27/2021. (dsto, ) |
Filing 18 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol.(Johnson, James) |
Filing 17 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by David A Eck.(Thomas, Lisa) |
Filing 16 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by David A Eck, Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of, Myrtle Beach, City of, South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol.(Johnson, James) Modified on 7/26/2021 to delete proposed order. (dsto, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IN PART Response filed by Miguel Angel De Leon Aguilar.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/16/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Hodge, James) |
Filing 12 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of, Myrtle Beach, City of.(Battle, Michael) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IN PART. Response to Motion due by 7/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/30/2021.(prou, ) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants SCDPS's and SCHP's Motion to Dismiss in Part by Miguel Angel De Leon Aguilar. Response to Motion due by 7/13/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Hodge, James) |
Filing 9 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 7/12/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 7/26/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 7/26/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/15/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/20/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/19/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 11/19/2021, Discovery due by 1/18/2022, Motions due by 2/2/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 3/18/2022, ADR Statement due by 2/1/2022, Mediation Due by 3/3/2022. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to April 18, 2022. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs seven (7) days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after April 18, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/22/2021. (prou, ) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of Myrtle Beach(Battle, Michael) Modified on 6/21/2021 to correct event code.(dsto) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol.(Johnson, James) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol. (Johnson, James) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IN PART by South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Highway Patrol. Response to Motion due by 7/2/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Johnson, James) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by David A Eck. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Thomas, Lisa) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by David A Eck. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(prou, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-26-02869. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9900344), filed by David A Eck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.