Vernon Goodwin v. Bryan Stirling et al
| Vernon Goodwin |
| Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen |
| 4:2021cv02051 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to make return or otherwise plead. Return and Memorandum is now due up to and including October 11, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 09/08/2021.(dsto, )
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time by Kenneth Nelsen. Response to Motion due by 9/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Maye, William) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Kenneth Nelsen. (Brown, Melody) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due by 9/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 07/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition)(dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 Receipt number 0420-9952061), filed by Vernon Goodwin.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
